Protecting firefighters from PFAS: Lessons from Austin, gaps across Texas

Firefighters have to rely on general federal guidelines, such as OSHA's General Duty Clause, which requires workplace safety, but does not limit PFAS foam usage.

Legislation aimed at safeguarding responders' lives, as seen in Senate Bill 1898, sought to restrict the use of foams during training sessions. However, the bills were not enacted into law, so the majority of departments can legally use the foams for training and emergency purposes.

How Austin leads the way in protecting firefighters from PFAS

While state laws lag behind, the city of Austin is making significant moves in the right direction. In 2024, the Austin City Council adopted Resolution 20240912-057 to stop the use of PFAS-containing materials. Austin's initiative includes:

• Switching to alternatives: adopting fluorine-free foams that meet safety standards
• Blood testing: Using grant funds to test firefighters' blood for PFAS, establishing a reference point for all firefighters
• Annual accountability: Providing yearly updates to the City Council to ensure the transition stays on track

Other supporting actions mentioned in the resolution include:

• Conducting a comprehensive inventory of current PFAS-containing firefighting equipment and materials
• Evaluating the financial impact of transitioning away from PFAS-containing foam, including potential funding sources or budget adjustments
• Coordinating with other city departments to implement the plan efficiently
• Collaborating with aviation authorities to make sure that PFAS elimination plans conform to FAA regulations
• Safe disposal and recycling of PFAS-containing equipment

Using Austin initiatives to protect firefighters and support PFAS claims

Austin's success is major, but strictly local. For firefighters everywhere else in Texas' municipalities and counties, the danger of PFAS exposure remains high because most departments can still legally use PFAS foam for training, testing, and actual emergencies, and there is no statewide law compelling them to switch to safer alternatives.

All the information above is crucial for those who wish to file a compensation claim. Programs like Austin's blood testing and the documentation of failed state bills may provide solid evidence of exposure. They show that firefighters were knowingly exposed to recognized hazards without adequate protection from the state. This documentation is exactly what is needed to link your health issues as a firefighter to your years of service and pursue successful compensation for the health problems you've experienced, with the support of ELG Law.